Montana: The Promised Land for Employees?

Montana is the only State that requires employers to have a good reason (or “good cause”) to fire an employee.

Under Montana law, “A discharge is wrongful … if … the discharge was not for good cause.”

Wisconsin, like most States, is not a “good cause” State and is instead an “employment-at-will” State.  This means in WI an employer may fire an employee “for good cause, for no cause, or even for cause morally wrong, without (the employer) being thereby guilty of legal wrong.”  Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet, 113 Wis.2d 561, 567 (WI SC 1983).

So, which State is better?  Is Montana an employee’s promised land, or another attempt at utopia that’s bound to fail?  Should Wisconsin be a “good cause” State?  I don’t have an answer, other than to say WI law should be better to employees than it is.

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Philosophy - Employee Rights

3 responses to “Montana: The Promised Land for Employees?

  1. Pingback: Employment at Will, and Three General Exceptions | Peterson, Berk & Cross

  2. Pingback: Employment at Will, and Three General Exceptions « WI Employee Rights Lawyers, Wages, Sexual Harassment, H1B

  3. Pingback: Employment at Will, and Three General Exceptions

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s