Promoting Employee Voice in the American Economy: A Call for Comprehensive Reform
Monthly Archives: August 2011
“Promoting Employee Voice in the American Economy: A Call for Comprehen” by Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt
Were You Denied WI Unemployment in the Initial Determination? If You Appeal, Don’t Be Late!
If you are a Wisconsin worker who lost your initial determination for unemployment benefits, and you want to contest/appeal that decision, make sure you file your appeal on time, and before the deadline stated on the determination document.
An appeal can be submitted online at the unemployment division’s website (click here), or via a letter. When submitting the appeal, you should be very careful to closely follow the instructions on the determination form, and– I’ll emphasize it again– to submit the appeal before the deadline.
The initial determination form you received will state the deadline, and the instructions for filing an appeal via internet or letter.
If an appeal is filed late, it is very difficult to get unemployment benefits. Wisconsin’s unemployment division does not accept most excuses for a late appeal, and usually will not accept late appeals.
Don’t procrastinate. File the appeal the same day you received the determination if possible. It does not take long, and most of the information in the appeal is very straight-forward. I have another post here about things to consider when submitting an appeal.
Please note this post does not provide legal advice- if you want legal advice, you must talk to an attorney about your specific situation. If you are interested in legal assistance from attorney-author Michael Brown or his law firm DVG Law Partner for your Wisconsin unemployment matter, please contact us here:
Filed under Unemployment - Wisconsin
An Excellent Article With Cites/Authority For Employee Rights Attorneys
For you employee rights attorneys out there who deal with federal summary judgment motions and common employer arguments, including those arguments that over-rely on the credibility of employer (interested) witnesses, this article is a must read:
“Preserving the Right to a Jury Trial by Preventing Adverse Credibility Inferences at Summary Judgment,” by attorney Matthew C. Koski, of The Employee Rights Advocacy Institute For Law & Policy.
This article has a very good discussion of the legal authority, and includes case law and cites that every employee rights attorney could use to help their employee-clients in federal summary judgment practice.
Filed under Philosophy - Employee Rights
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ www.dollarsordemocracy.org #WeThePeople
The U.S. Supreme Court claims that money is the same thing as speech. And now because of the 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling, huge corporations can spend unlimited amounts of money to influence elections. This decision opened the floodgates for corporate money to drown out the voices of real people in politics.
Join the online protest against corporate money drowning out the voices of real people. $peak out and update your status to:
#WeThePeople will #reclaim
Spread the word far and wide by clicking on the links below.
How Preparing to Be a Good Witness Is Like Weight Training
When I prepare with an individual before a legal proceeding in which he or she will testify– say, for example, when I meet with a worker before a deposition or unemployment hearing– I discuss with that person what it means to be a good witness.
Being a good witness does not simply mean telling the truth, although that is certainly a necessary and important part of it.
Being a good witness also means work.
Googling for Legal Information: The Good and Bad
Perhaps you found this legal site’s webpage because you have a legal issue that you want free information about, and a Google search led you here.
As a consumer, I have often used a Google or other website searches to find free information.
Sometimes, that has been successful for me. For example, my dryer once stopped running, so I did a web search, found a repair video for my particular dryer symptoms, and the video showed a fix (showed me how a dryer fuse was the likely culprit and how to install a new dryer fuse). So I followed the instructions to install a new fuse in my dryer and… it worked (!!).
For one cycle. Then my dryer went kaput again. So I was back at square one, and about $30 lighter for the new fuse that I’d purchased and ruined.
The fact my web-inspired dryer fix did not work does not itself mean the how-to- video was ineffective. In fact, my botched repair was almost certainly caused by my terrible repair skills more so than the video’s content. The video was in fact competent in diagnosing a problem like mine, and in advising a reasonable potential fix for my dryer’s symptoms. (When I later talked to a repairperson, he told me the video’s diagnosis and fix I saw were reasonable but just one of several potential matches for my dryer’s symptoms, and as it turned out, the wrong match).
I learned a lesson about internet searches and web-based fixes: sometimes, the nature of the problem– in my case, a $50-$500 problem of either repairing a dryer correctly and/or botching the fix and/or replacing the dryer– requires the actual presence and communication from someone who knows what they are doing.
The same is true of legal advice.
Doing a web search for legal information may be helpful to a certain extent. A web search, for example, may tell you some laws and some important issues that you had not previously taken into account when considering your problem. It may make you a better-informed consumer.
However, if you take action based on that web information alone– without talking to an attorney about your legal situation– you may wind up with the legal equivalent of a botched dryer repair. If the stakes involved are greater than a new dryer’s pricetag (which IS often the case with many legal situations, whether people realize it or not), then that’s all the more reason to get legal advice from an attorney as compared to a website.
Please note that does not mean I’m saying you must get MY legal advice, or that of any paid attorney, just that legal advice you’d get from a competent attorney (whether private, nonprofit etc.) beats website information however competent that information appears on its face.